The Noggin Blog

Spotlight on Boeing’s 737 Max Aircraft: What you need to know about the ongoing crisis

Posted by The Brain on Mar 20, 2019 8:21:26 AM

 

By now, most know at least the outlines of the story. In October 2018, Lion Air Flight 670 crashed into the Java Sea on a domestic route from Jakarta to Pangkal Pinang in Indonesia. All 189 passengers and crew on board were killed. Weeks later, engine failure forced a Norwegian Air Shuttle flight to make an emergency landing in Iran. And more recently, on March 10, 2019, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashed just minutes after takeoff from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on its way to Nairobi, Kenya. As in the case of the Lion Air crash, all 150-plus passengers and crew on board perished. The common factor between the seemingly isolated incidents? The aircraft in all three flights belonged to a relatively new line of planes: the Boeing 737 Max 8.

The successor to Boeing’s 737 Next Generation (737NG), the 737 Max is the latest in Boeing’s line of single-aisle airplanes. Boosted for its fuel efficiency (which lowers operating costs for purchasing airlines), the new line has been a top seller. In fact, the 737 Max has become Boeing’s fastest-selling aircraft since its release into passenger service less than two years ago: more than 40 airliners include the aircraft within their fleets. Major customers in the U.S. alone include Southwest, American, and United.

boeing 2@2x

However, Boeing secured the 737 Max’s fuel efficiency gains by outfitting the aircraft with slightly larger engines than previous 737 models. In turn, the larger engines changed the 737 Max’s center of gravity, shifting it further, which, then, increased the risk of the aircraft pitching up after takeoff. Countering the risk required building dedicated software, dubbed Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, or MCAS. That system is designed to get readings from aircraft sensors, which measure the aircraft’s angle in relation to wind flow. Depending on the sensor’s reading, the MCAS system will automatically trigger the plane’s nose to angle downward – the danger is if the sensor gives an erroneous reading.

It is this system that is now at the center of the escalating controversy surrounding the two 737 Max crashes. The flight control software was suspected as a cause of the Lion Air crash; like in the later Ethiopian Air crash, Lion Air pilots struggled to control their planes soon after takeoff.

The striking parallel between the two incidents – satellite data even showed that the two plane’s trajectories were similar – led to safety officials across the world grounding the 737 Max. But among major, national air safety regulators, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was the last to act, grounding the planes several days after the Ethiopian Air crash. This, too, has led to controversy, as critics of the FAA’s approach suggest that Boeing holds too much sway with the agency and can influence the vetting of its own aircraft for regulatory approval.

Indeed, a 2012 Department of Transportation (DoT) investigation found that Boeing exercises too much influence over safety approvals of its new aircraft. Specifically, DoT auditors claimed that the FAA hadn’t done enough “to hold Boeing accountable”. More recently, sources familiar with the 737 Max revealed that the DoT’s inspector general had been examining the plane’s design certification just days before the Ethiopian Air crash. Meanwhile, the FAA’s decision to ground the fleet of aircraft would only come days later.

So, what’s next? Well, the 737 Max remains grounded for the foreseeable future, especially after data recovered from the Ethiopian Air wreckage showed “clear similarities” with the Lion Air crash. What’s more, the practice (or culture) of “outsourcing safety” regulation to Boeing will continue to come into question. In fact, just yesterday, the Justice Department opened up a federal probe into how Boeing was regulated by the FAA. Following news of the investigation, Transport Canada released notice that it was re-evaluating the validation it gave to the Boeing line.

No doubt more is to come from this ongoing story.

 

Sources:

The New York Times: E.U. Suspends Boeing 737 Max 8 Operations, but F.A.A. Stands Firm
Benjamin Zhang, Business insider: Two Boeing 737 MAX airlines have crashed since October – here are the airlines that fly the plane
Brian Pascus, CBS News: How is the Boeing 737 Max 8 different from other Boeing 737 airplanes?
Leslie Josephs and Kevin Breuninger, CNBC: US grounds Boeing 737 Max planes, citing links between 2 fatal crashes
Los Angeles Times: Boeing had too much sway vetting its own planes, FAA was warned
Hope Yen and Tom Krisher, Chicago Sun Times: Justice Dept. probing development of Boeing jets
David Ljunngren, Reuters: Canada re-examining Boeing 737 MAX approval after FAA certification probe

 
For more content like what you just read, follow @teamnoggin on Twitter.

Topics: Crisis Management, Incident Management, Critical Issues Management, Crisis Plans, Crisis Planning


Meet Noggin: all-hazards enterprise resilience software.

Thanks for stopping by!

The Noggin software suite provides flexible information management solutions capable of managing all hazards across a wide range of industries, from the smallest complaint to a multi-national emergency. We help organizations handle all hazards, all media, all devices, all processes - in one suite of software products. Organizations across the world rely on Noggin to help them manage disruptive events more effectively and protect the bottom line for their communities and businesses.

Want to learn more? Get in touch:

 

Subscribe to Email Updates

Recent Posts